As regards Dr. Extel's recommendation, but as I gather any much regulation much affect all the grant-in-aid schools whereas De Extel & fovende in this Despatch seem merely to discurs & counder its on this particular school. This matter has no doubt been fully considered before; see that in paragraph 15 of Despatch No. 15 - 6 Feb: 79 on S.887 Sie In Hicks Beach declined to alter the rule on Julijch withhah Sief. Dope Hewnary going further back I see this question discussed again wayed as wiswiserly affecting some of the other schools.
The Annex is new to me & I feel diffident at expressing an opinion but I notice that the Ceylon code only requires 100 attendances, and I should have thought that a decision should be arrived at. Gad of 200 working days and a somewhat smaller number, attendances so as to allow for accidental absences might be sufficient?.
You will see by De avand fitel report what that the "Education to late. Carply Exceeded, but this was no double to be expected.
On 5.14636 when Sie Mr. Hicks-Beach declared himself in favour of maintaining the required cut of 200 attendan as a safeguard against "camming".
Schould be nichuried to agen cia Lo longer necessary the second point.
Page information is not detected in this text, however, some words are missing or unclear due to OCR damage.
... in mouths & nob in the mintes ... 316 ... auch kuinself ... Altan ... 190 ... manj in for ... aut 14/0p. P.J.O.
has been re-written to meet the requirements as follows:As regards Dr. Extel's recommendation, but as I gather, much regulation much affects all the grant-in-aid schools, whereas De Extel & favoured in this Despatch seem merely to discuss & consider it on this particular school. This matter has no doubt been fully considered before; see paragraph 15 of Despatch No.15 - 6 Feb:79 on S.887, Sir In Hicks Beach declined to alter the rule on Julijch with Sir F. Doyle's mitigation in 4049/79 again wisely affecting some of the other schools.
The Annex is new to me & I feel diffident at expressing an opinion, but I notice that the Ceylon code only requires 100 attendances, and I should have thought that a decision should be arrived at. Going further back, I see this question discussed, and a reduction to 200 working days and a somewhat smaller number of attendances, so as to allow for accidental absences, might be sufficient?.
You will see by De avant file report that the "Education to date" Carply Exceeded, but this was no doubt to be expected.
On S.14636, when Sir Mr. Hicks-Beach declared himself in favour of maintaining the required cut of 200 attendances as a safeguard against "camming".
It should be noted that ... Lo is no longer necessary the second point.
... in mouths & nob in the minutes ... 316 ... also himself ... Altan ... 190 ... many in for ... aut 14/0p. P.J.O.
has been formatted using HTML as per the instructions. Here is the final output:As regards Dr. Extel's recommendation, but as I gather, much regulation much affects all the grant-in-aid schools, whereas De Extel & favoured in this Despatch seem merely to discuss & consider it on this particular school. This matter has no doubt been fully considered before; see paragraph 15 of Despatch No.15-6 Feb:79 on S.887, Sir In Hicks Beach declined to alter the rule on Julijch with Sir F. Doyle's mitigation in 4049/79 again wisely affecting some of the other schools.
The Annex is new to me & I feel diffident at expressing an opinion, but I notice that the Ceylon code only requires 100 attendances, and I should have thought that a decision should be arrived at. Going further back, I see this question discussed, and a reduction to 200 working days and a somewhat smaller number of attendances, so as to allow for accidental absences, might be sufficient?.
You will see by De avant file report that the "Education to date" Carply Exceeded, but this was no doubt to be expected.
On S.14636, when Sir Mr. Hicks-Beach declared himself in favour of maintaining the required cut of 200 attendances as a safeguard against "camming".
Should be included again ... Lo is no longer necessary the second point.
... in mouths & nob in the minutes ... 316 ... also himself ... Altan ... 190 ... many in for ... aut 14/0p. P.J.O.
any fuck
assistanc
such pos
من
As regards
Lo
longer necessary
the second point
Schould be nichuried to
agen
cia
Dr. Extel's recommendation, but
As
as I gather any much regulation much affech all the geant. in. and
schools whereas De Extel & fovende in this Des
the
in this Despatch seem
effect
merely to discurs & counder its on this particular school. This
مجھے
مد
in mouths
& nob
in the mintes
on 5.14636
316
when Sie Mr. Hicks- Reach declared
auch
kuinself in favour of maintaining the required cut of 200 attendan as a safeguard againt camming".
O
The Anliech is new to me &
fuel diffident at expressing
An
afinion but I notice that the Ceylon code only requires
unction and 100 attendances, and Ishould
o matter has no doubt been fally than to have Plought, that a decision
coundered before; see that in
paragraph 15 of
on Des
Despatch ho.
15-6 Feb: 79 on 5.887 Sie In Hicks Beach
190
Altan
declined to alter the mile on
Julijch withhah Sief. Dope Hewnary
This
it's mitigation in 4049 179 again wayed as wiswiserly affecting some of the other schools. going further back I see this gestion discussed
100
tendances.
de anvesced. Gad
of 200 working days and
a
somewhat smaller number, attendances so as to allow
J
accidental absences
manj in for might be sufficient?.
You will see by
De avand fitel
what that the "Education to late.
refort
Carply
Exceeded, but this
was no double.
to be expected. a.a.d.,
aut 14/0p.
P.J.O.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.